Weekly column by Konstantin von Eggert
The audience was small and the location in central Moscow - a Christian cultural center - probably not the most glamorous. But that did not stop Mario Mauro from giving a sparkling performance on his favourite subjects: persecution of Christians around the world, aggressive secularism in Europe, and the way forward toward closer spiritual bonds between the Catholic and Orthodox churches.
Konstantin von Eggert
Mauro, one of the most outspoken members of the European People’s Party group in the European parliament, is serving his third term there under constant attack from the left and secular liberal factions for his views, which stress equal adherence to Christian teachings as well as to democratic principles.
As Mauro himself likes to say, the founders of modern Europe like Robert Schuman or Alcide de Gasperi, were practicing Catholics and saw European unity not only as a practical political arrangement but as a spiritual endeavour based on Christian understanding of humanism, freedom and responsibility.
Listening to the Italian MEP I could not help thinking that there are no Christian politicians in Russia. There seem to be very few secular liberal politicians either.
The left can boast of a couple of people who seem to have certain sincerely held convictions, like the firebrand leader of the Left Front movement Sergei Udaltsov. But turning my mental gaze towards the dominant United Russia party, I could not find anyone who could have been called a “conviction politician.”
“Conviction politics” – i.e., those that are dictated by the politicians’ firmly held political beliefs – are a rare thing in Russia. That is not to say that there are no politicians with ideas – there are plenty. But conviction politics is distinguished by a set of beliefs and attitudes that are a product of a coherent view of the world and human nature. It frequently (but not necessarily) flows from deeply held religious beliefs.
Margaret Thatcher is a classic example of a conviction politician on the right; assassinated Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme is one on the left.
Hardly any politician qualifies as Russia’s answer to Thatcher or Palme. Strangely enough, even the icons of recent Russian history, Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin, would probably not fit into this select category. The late Andrei Sakharov would have, if he had lived long enough.
Among modern-day Russian leaders, jailed tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky comes closest to displaying the unique combination of well-grounded philosophical foundations and practical ideas about the future of Russia – but he himself continues to claim that he doesn’t want to go into politics. In the meantime Russia seems to be in dire need of exactly this kind of leader: bold, devoid of cynicism, but at the same time firmly grounded in reality.
My explanation for this is Russia’s tragic twentieth century history. For seventy years the country was isolated from the currents of ideas that swept through the Western world: positivism, existentialism, libertarianism, Christian democracy and modern day social democracy.
All these trends developed without touching Russia in any meaningful way. The twenty years since the collapse of Communism is too short a time for these ideas to have sunk in and take on a meaning of their own in the Russian context. The Kremlin-sponsored cynicism of the last decade did not help either.
The deeply held belief that all politics are dirty and that politicians everywhere are on the take and on the make is widespread and benefits the Russian ruling class.
However the recent wave of pro-democracy demonstrations that swept through Russia, if anything, revealed the society’s hunger for people with convictions. The protest movement was formed in opposition to this all-prevailing cynicism and craves those who could not only raise funds and organize rallies, but formulate the wholesome worldview that would stand opposed to the tired Kremlin clichés like “stability” and Soviet-style “great power” ambitions.
There is definitely room here for Russia’s nascent Christian democrats in the Mario Mauro vein, social democrats like Palme or Pierre Trudeau or conservatives of the Reagan-Thatcher variety. Conviction politics will change Russia’s politics irrevocably the moment it emerges there.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s and may not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.
What is Russia's place in this world? Unashamed and unreconstructed Atlanticist, Konstantin von Eggert believes his country to be part and parcel of the "global West." And while this is a minority view in Russia, the author is prepared to fight from his corner.
Konstantin Eggert is a commentator and host for radio Kommersant FM, Russia's first 24-hour news station. In the 1990s he was Diplomatic Correspondent for “Izvestia” and later the BBC Russian Service Moscow Bureau Editor. Konstantin has also spent some time working as ExxonMobil Vice-President in Russia. He was made Honorary Member of the Order of the British Empire by Queen Elizabeth II.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- arsanlupinA politician with moral convictions???20:56, 02/05/2012That would be quite a shock to the Russian political system - more's the pity. It's probably the only chance Russia has of surviving.
I hope I live to see the day - for their sake.
- metchi(no title)22:24, 02/05/2012Russia is not a Christian country...Russia is the country of Profit Mosses and his ancestors...you should beinformed long time ago that Italia is the Catholic country of the world where the ancestors of Haron brother of Mosses are there while Jordan is the country of the ancestors of Muhammad the father of low of Ali, the grand father of the offsprings in Jordan...Munia
- arsanlupinI think the Orthodox Patriarch might disagree ...00:50, 03/05/2012... but the topic wasn't religious; it was about ethics and morals and principals - and their scarcity in modern-day Russian politics.
By the way: Moses' family lived in Egypt about 4000 years ago. Back then Italy and Russia were nothing but forests and plains populated by maybe a handful of nomadic tribes; nothing more. Catholicism is more than 2000 years in his future - Russia came another 800 years after that when the Kievan Rus was formed.
I also suggest you use an English spell-checker - you really need it!
- NikoOpen your eyes Konstantine, there will be no revolution !10:03, 03/05/2012Western Europe (Germany, France, Italy) finaly realized after WW2 that only science and economy can transform devastated continent into modern and effective world player.
They have finally realized that only modern capitalist economy can overcome all religions and political ideologies.
Russia is only a young 20 years old capitalist economy...in the middle of huge economic transformation going on today...it needs strong and pragmatic central government to regulate economy.
The last thing Russia needs is religion and political ideologies. The fact you ideological utopists and demagogists cannot understand.
- pushkinlovWhat a Joke18:46, 04/05/2012"Among modern-day Russian leaders, jailed tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky comes closest to displaying the unique combination of well-grounded philosophical foundations and practical ideas about the future of Russia – but he himself continues to claim that he doesn’t want to go into politics." What else can a reader expect from this columnist? The glorification of a criminal; the endorsement of a thieve, and the extended voice of those who would love to see Russia in a western style "democracy," where the masters of manipulation enjoy the privileges and the benefits of criminal and fascist elements disguised in his concept of "conviction politician".
When Constantin is not attacking Putin, he enjoys kissing up.
Image Galleries: The World’s Most Notorious Prisons
Infographics: Group of Eight: Countries and Permanent Members
Cartoons: Polar Explorer Day
News that Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin would resign in order to run for the mayoral election in September came as quite a shock. Sobyanin’s political potential is fairly dubious, not to mention his approval ratings. He has not finished many of the projects he initiated and the electoral effect from these projects is expected to come a bit later than September 2013. Sobyanin’s opponents were not entirely unprepared for this blitzkrieg.