MOSCOW, June 26 (RIA Novosti, Alexey Eremenko)
- Kommersant owner Usmanov says no plans to sell publishing house
- Russians Think Media More Influential Than Political Parties
- Russia’s Media Market to Grow to $39 Bln by 2016 – PwC
- Half of Russians Believe Media Makes People Gay – Poll
- Medvedev Denies Media Censorship in Russia
The Kommersant publishing house announced on Tuesday that is getting rid of its television channel, continuing a post-election spell of closures and reshuffles in Russian liberal media.
Most media experts put the trend down to business reasons, but also said it is benefiting the Kremlin, which was often lambasted by media outlets now being closed or reorganized.
Kommersant TV, launched in 2011, is being closed because of its financial underperformance, Kommersant holding said on its website.
“A day of the channel’s operations loses enough money to buy a good German car,” director general of the publishing house, Dmitry Sergeyev, was cited by Slon.ru as saying. Slon.ru estimated total investment in the channel at $8 million-$10 million.
Reshuffles in Russian liberal media began in December, when editor-in-chief of Kommersant-Vlast political weekly, Maxim Kovalsky, stepped down after a clash with the publishing house’s billionaire owner Alisher Usmanov.
The tycoon, a self-professed Kremlin loyalist, was angered by Kommersant-Vlast running a photo of a ballot for the parliamentary elections with an insult to then-Prime Minister Vladimir Putin scribbled on it. The weekly has often criticized Putin in print before.
A string of media shake-ups commenced in early June, when the longstanding head of Kommersant publishing house, Demyan Kudryavtsev, resigned in favor of Sergeyev, who swiftly closed down the Russian version of Citizen K fashion magazine, which developed a heavy socio-political slant since its inception in 2007.
In June, Dozhd media holding fired Filipp Dzyadko, the editor-in-chief of Bolshoi Gorod magazine, another lifestyle publication which focused on politics in recent years, explicitly criticizing the Kremlin.
On Monday, the editorial staff of Openspace.ru, a popular website on culture and politics, announced that it was leaving because the site’s owner, businessman Vadim Belyayev, intended to change the publication into a purely political outlet. Kommersant-Vlast ex-editor Kovalsky will become the new editor-in-chief starting next month.
Unsatisfactory business performance was cited as the reason for most June closures and removals, though some media professionals disagreed.
The Kremlin has so far focused on controlling state television, but is now turning to online and print media in the wake of mass street protests in Moscow, Kovalsky said in an interview to Bolshoi Gorod on Monday.
The driving force of the protests were educated urbanites who also constitute the core readership of Kommersant’s publications, Bolshoi Gorod, Openspace.ru and similar media outlets.
However, many other journalists spoke rather of a chain of coincidences caused by financial constraints of Russian independent media, many of which, including Kommersant TV and Openspace.ru, stayed in the red throughout their entire history.
“Every publication must make money…If it doesn’t happen, it gets closed down,” editor-in-chief of Forbes Russia, Yelizaveta Osetinskaya, told Bolshoi Gorod.
Nevertheless, the result of this trend is “shrinking of the space of freedom of the press and an easier life for Putin,” said Yury Saprykin, the head of Afisha-Rambler media holding.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
The growing outright rivalry between the United States and China gives Russia more foreign policy weight, enabling it to assume the role of a balancer. So far it has been doing so rather skillfully. Today it may participate in a joint naval exercise with China that Beijing positions as outwardly anti-American. But tomorrow it can team up with the naval forces of the Old World.