Topic: Protests in Syria
WASHINGTON, July 13 (RIA Novosti)
- UN Syria Resolution ‘Unacceptable’ - Moscow
- Russia to Oppose UN Sanctions against Syria – Diplomat
- Syrian Opposition Urges UN Security Council Action
- Russia Submits Draft Syria Observer Resolution to UN
The United States does not rule out that the UN Security Council member states will be able to agree on a Syria resolution, despite Russia’s threat to veto any such document if it implies the possibility of using sanctions or military force against the Syrian government.
“Having been myself a member of many United Nations Security Council sessions and many negotiations, there are a lot of times that people stake out positions publicly, but we negotiate these documents behind closed doors, and we come to an agreement among all 15 members of the Security Council about the best way forward,” U.S. State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell said during a daily press briefing in Washington on Friday.
“So one can try to negotiate it publicly, but ultimately, it will be negotiated behind closed doors,” he added.
When asked whether he could recall a case when Russia threatened to veto a UN resolution and then let it pass, Ventrell said: "What I can tell you is there are a lot of times that people stake out a position that changes."
The 15 UN Security Council member states began talks on Thursday on a Syria resolution designed to force the government of President Bashar al-Assad and opposition forces to lay down arms and begin negotiations to end the 17 months of violence in Syria.
The conflict, which began in March last year, has left between 13,000 and 17,000 people dead, according to Syrian rights activists quoted by the United Nations.
The United States, France, Britain and Germany have drafted a resolution that would give the Assad government ten days to comply with a previously agreed peace plan of face punishment ranging from diplomatic and economic sanctions to the use of military force under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter.
Russia said on Thursday it would veto the Western-backed draft if it is put to a vote at the UN Security Council.
“We have stated repeatedly that Chapter 7 of the UN Charter is unacceptable to us,” Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said.
Moscow and Beijing have twice vetoed Security Council resolutions that so much as hinted at sanctions again the Assad government.
Russia has proposed its own draft resolution that would extend a UN monitoring mission to Syria for 90 days, without any threat of sanctions. France’s UN Ambassador Gerard Araud said the Russian draft “has no teeth” and would fail to bring about any positive change in Syria.
Western news agencies quoted on Friday Syrian opposition activists and the London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights as saying that between 100 and 220 people have been killed in an assault by government troops and pro-Assad Shabiha militiamen on a village in the Hama province in central Syria. The reports cannot be independently verified.
Add to blog
You may place this material on your blog by copying the link.
- living069whats wrong with this picture?04:19, 13/07/2012here's what's wrong, the west has already elected the "new" leaders of Syria without having an election, does this mean now anyone can take up arms and not recognize their own governments if they don't like them, then create the same as in Syria?, will the western armies then start attacking people against their government?, i know 100% they will, yet they are plain hypocrites.
- mrgenieCould you please tell us your sources10:41, 13/07/2012Every single source on the internet says the west is actually reluctant into messing into syria as they have no one to talk too since the west does NOT recognize the syrian opposition as the legal representatives of Syria. The "West" does however claim that killing woman and children is not the way to go. But the West is actually asking countries to stop messing around and keep out. The only countries interfering with Syria are Russia and Iran who repeatedly said they will continue to support Assad in his struggle to kill woman and children. The west has the power to stop Russia from supporting Assad and helping him with slaughtering civilians, but the West is actually the only one staying out of this conflict. As a result of the Russian support to kill innocent people, Arab countries are now backing Syrian opposition, so what we see here, is a struggle between Russia, Iran Syria on one side, and Arab nations on the other side, and the west trying to negotiate a peace between these 2 conflicting blocks. It's funny to see Mr. Lavrov yelling from the highest towers in the world not to interfere, while Russia and Iran are the 2 biggest, and mostly alone partners of Assad. And actually the only once supporting and interfering with this conflict before the Arab nations stepped in.
So indeed, since Russia is sending and using force in Syria, at some point the west might join the Arab nations and throw the Russians and Russian weaponry out of Syria to prevent more woman and children being slaughtered by Russian weapons.
Image Galleries: New "Watercolors" Train Exhibition in the Moscow Metro
Infographics: The Origin of Geomagnetic Storms
Cartoons: Dreams of Space
The failure of the Islamist political parties who came to power in the dramatic events of the Arab Spring would allow the military to reenter the political arena. Political Islam was successful in the opposition, but it could fail in power, as the negative experience of Egypt and Iraq have shown.